NatureHaven
Poslednja aktivnost dana: 13.11.26 7:07:22 AM
Status:
Zaprati
Pokloni 1
O meni
Here's what I typed in chat before being blocked by Taanni. I was emotional and had a lot of fear that we wouldn't see another show. She said she didn't see the goal being reached, so it was good that I reminded her. She responded: "Thanks for saying that." I remember when -GubkaBob- responded to a goal being reached by mentioning "goal" in public chat, with an image. He's paying attention. He tips for goals.
Pratioci
Komentari 75
13.11.26.
Intimacy isn't fanaticism. An intimate person connects with humans in a qualitative, not quantitative, way. This means they have fewer friends and stronger friendships. Their attention will be less divided amongst different people. It will be more centered on specific individuals. Their caring is deeper. They deeply care. Indeed, because their attention isn't divided. I only watch one model. It's because of how better they are than all the others I've seen. I dedicate my time to one.
13.11.26.
Most of Taanni's followers don't believe she's a princess. They actually like many different models and aren't seeking out a princess. The opposite is true. You can learn this by observing the number of followings they have. It's rarely a low number. This is a minority of people. They're not fanatics. They're intimate, of course, something you don't normally see. This is informative research. I only followed her. This isn't fanaticism. It's intimacy. She's deeply mistaken.
13.11.26.
My research doesn't have a bad motive. I'm confused why she thinks this. I asked her why, respectfully, and she thought my question was sarcasm and arguing, and she insulted me and assumed I have bad motives. It's just research, not a bad thing. I'm curious and open-minded. For example, someone could do research and determine the times where there's the most active tipping, so she could prioritize these times. I guess she only likes humor and doesn't want to hear any research?
13.11.26.
Taanni said my "activity raises questions." O_o I'm confused. I'm just a researcher, not some sort of nefarious, fake person, but she has this impression. Research is good. I've been a researcher for years. It's real. And, when I tried to convince her otherwise, she think it's arguing. It's all strange. The chat regulars didn't have the impression there was a bad motive in my public chat activity. We got along. Yet, she thinks all my behavior has a bad motive. I was genuinely trying to help.
12.11.26.
In PM, it's true that Taanni was abusive to me. In public chat, I was a decent man, to say the least. I told rude people to be polite to her. In one instance, ce_fute agreed with me. Her fans agreed with me. They did. They know I was decent. I didn't insult her. In PM, she quickly insulted me for the effort I put into the stream; she thinks it's fake. In another PM, she used profanity: "F*** off." Yes, she said this. The whole time, I was nice to her. She was too angry to be saved.
12.11.26.
Her other stream is running smoothly. There used to be an issue, her approval rating used to be well below-average, but she has since greatly improved. It's now at 100%. If you remember, at the time, she was missing tip menu performances. This is now rarely an issue. The number recently reached 100%. Improvement is possible. She has done it before. It means better streams, more fun. In life, continuous improvement is a good mentality to have. It doesn't mean you don't support the model.
12.11.26.
Taanni told me she doesn't need a moderator. I was trying to help the stream, but she believes it didn't help. It's confusing, because _napoleon_ and I were doing similar mod work. It helps the stream. When she's running three streams, she can become distracted, which she has mentioned. We can provide immediate answers, so her workload is less. If we tell a viewer the price of a tip menu item, they may tip for it. This helps her. It has happened before.
11.11.26.
I'm respectful to everyone on the stream. The regulars in chat know this. Insults are disrespectful, I don't behave like this. I was insulted, then verbally abused, but I responded with composure and decency. From the beginning, Taanni thought everything had a bad motive, that everything was derogatory, and she's simply mistaken. It's sad that emotion is skewing her perception of reality. Support told me that models are also required to perform completed goals. This is the main point.
11.11.26.
If you speak about Taanni's ethnicity, she may get offended. She thinks it's a personal insult. No... Her viewers are simply curious. There's no bad motive here. On one stream, they said she looked Asian. They're not trying to insult her. Of course not. They're just making innocent observations. I'm surprised she has this interpretation. I thought she may be curious and open-minded. I am. Viewers want to know the origin of her beauty. They don't mean any harm to her.
11.11.26.
Message from Support (to me): "We understand your point and appreciate your willingness to help maintain a friendly and respectful environment on the platform." Support is showing empathy and being supportive. They tell me the rules and I follow them. Honestly, this is what I'm doing, and Taanni is mistaken. From the beginning, she didn't understand me. I tried to clarify that I'm a good person, but she thought I was arguing. Sadly, it's a severe misunderstanding. She blocked a loyal viewer.
Pogledaj još komentara
